[user] It's not helpful to send threaded messages into the channel. Thank you!
Sorry if this has been asked before
4 Answers
[user] oh no, don't roll out Clay to 100 sales reps globally. This goes against the best practices I've heard as well as my personal experience. No sales rep I ever met was able to handle Clay. Happy to explain if you want to book a 1:1 call (use the booking link in my linkedin profile)
[user] I understand your point, the goal isn't to give them access to the tables and enrichment, but to give them the ability to call Clay to get the enrichment done in SF without burning the credits and to send emails.
[user] Thanks a lot, good food for thoughts! I know lemlist well too and it makes sense. Good remark about the domain, it's also in the project. Thanks again :slightly_smiling_face:
[user]
-
Salesforce form or Slack integration is both fine (Clay gets triggered via Webhook) -The rep request lands in a “gatekeeper” table managed by RevOps Admin -Clay enriches only after the request passes validation (deduplication, ICP fit check, etc.) -Credit spend: Have an aggregated overview and notifications in place. I’m not sure about a smoother solution.
-
We only use separate sequencers (Lemlist) because they offer many advantages, such as direct analytics and multi-channel functionality. I would recommend it.
Then have HIL functionality in place, e.g. via an n8n flow, so sales reps just have to edit/send the drafted message straight away in Google Mail. (btw, you are you not running your Coldmails from your main domain?)
Disagree or spot an error? Submit a correction here. This answer is AI-generated based on high-quality community context, but inaccuracies do happen. Your feedback helps us maintain the best information.
Add your take
Have experience with the tools discussed here? Share your honest opinion.